Episode 1: Interview with Parker Conrad
Newcomer PodAugust 23, 202100:39:2854.22 MB

Episode 1: Interview with Parker Conrad

Our show begins with our first ever guest, Rippling CEO Parker Conrad. He talks about why the tech press spends too much time listening to VCs who don't have nearly as much power as reporters think. He also looks back at the way he was infamously pushed out of his previous company, Zenefits, and the role A16Z played in that saga.




Our thanks to @yungchomsky for our theme music.



Get full access to Newcomer at www.newcomer.co/subscribe

00:00:05
Welcome, welcome to the first episode of

00:00:20
dead cat. I'm Eric, newcomer the writer

00:00:24
and author of newcomer. The newsletter here, with Tom

00:00:28
Dayton and Katie Benner, who will introduce themselves as

00:00:33
we've got a very special guest, Parker, Conrad, Katie Tom, and I

00:00:37
have been friends for years. And I've had this long-running

00:00:40
sort of message thread, signal thread, where we've chatted

00:00:44
about the media and Tech and sort of gossiped about sort of,

00:00:48
you know, the meta story of what's happening in Tech, sort

00:00:51
of reading the stories, in another light.

00:00:55
And so we sort of wanted to try out a podcast where we You know,

00:01:00
talked about tech in the coverage of tech from a totally

00:01:04
different lens in this in this world, you know, where, you

00:01:07
know, technology companies are more ascendant than ever before.

00:01:11
Anyway, so that I mean, that's, that's the very quick

00:01:14
introduction. I think we should just get into

00:01:16
it. Tom, you want to say hello?

00:01:20
Sure. Hey, I thought you give a very

00:01:21
sanitized version of what. Okay, now we're at was I thought

00:01:25
it was where we were giving our marching orders to the

00:01:27
mainstream media in which they would discuss.

00:01:29
Exactly. What we wanted them to and to

00:01:31
pick these tech companies in the specifically - and detrimental

00:01:35
light that we all intend these companies to be viewed.

00:01:38
So I actually thought there was a lot more power imbued into

00:01:41
that chat room, but I guess it was just a place for us to push

00:01:43
it. I misunderstood the point of

00:01:46
this thread. My name is Tom as Eric said, I

00:01:49
am a reporter at Insider. I'm supposed to call it that.

00:01:52
Now, not Business Insider, where I cover, the gig economy, Uber

00:01:58
Lyft, doordash instacart go. Huff frequently.

00:02:01
So that's my, that's my beat there.

00:02:03
But yeah, a newcomer and Katie and I used to work together at

00:02:06
the information, way back in the day.

00:02:08
And I think, actually, all of us at some point covered Uber,

00:02:13
right? Briefly and Eric, you make Isaac

00:02:19
me and another Uber reporter, all at my house, one night in

00:02:22
San Francisco, and Reuters broken, Uber story, and none of

00:02:25
us were able to match it. We were definitely all covering

00:02:29
Uber At the die. Yes.

00:02:31
You can see very Insider regroup but yeah.

00:02:34
Anyway, that's that's that's my background here.

00:02:36
And I used to write about media. So I'm the, I'm the media guy on

00:02:39
this show. Yes, I'm covering the justice

00:02:42
department for the New York Times.

00:02:43
I really just kind of a special guest here but it's really fun

00:02:46
to think about tech again because I will say as a beat it

00:02:52
is more fun in many ways than covering the justice department.

00:02:57
Cool. And yeah, I'll introduce par

00:02:59
girl. But I mean, Parker Conrad, you

00:03:02
know, we got to know him or I've known him for a long time as the

00:03:05
CEO of zenefits covered sort of the rise of that company.

00:03:08
I would have businessweek feature on it when it was new

00:03:11
and exciting. And then, you know, Parker got

00:03:15
pushed out. It was a huge headline story,

00:03:17
and I wrote about that and I'm sure we'll be talking about the

00:03:20
zenefits story, which is given Parker is super interesting

00:03:23
perspective on the media. I mean I also love that Parker

00:03:28
is someone who, you know, Did his college newspaper.

00:03:31
So he sort of got the media there and then, you know, has,

00:03:35
he's very mixed views about what's great about Silicon

00:03:39
Valley and not that sort of, I don't know.

00:03:42
Both both are somewhat in line with the rah-rah story and sort

00:03:47
of super critical of it. So I am very excited to hear

00:03:53
what what Parker has say Parker. I mean, what inspired you to

00:03:57
walk into this death trap of three Reporters on our first

00:04:01
podcast. The gosh.

00:04:05
I don't know. I guess you know you're making

00:04:09
me nervous here. Eric, why did I make a mistake

00:04:12
here? What is it too, late?

00:04:17
I mean I think that I guess I think that there are, you know,

00:04:25
I think I you and I have spoken before about sort of my view of

00:04:30
sort of the media VC complex in in Silicon Valley and kind of

00:04:38
how that impacts the narrative and coverage and sort of the

00:04:41
things that the things, some of the things that I sort of

00:04:45
dislike about that. And so I think there are

00:04:49
relatively few people That are willing to give an alternate

00:04:55
perspective, that I think is government, so that's some of

00:04:59
it. And then obviously like like a

00:05:03
like a lot of people who sort of love and hate and need the

00:05:07
media. You know, I've got a company to

00:05:09
pitch and and and so there's there's always that that angle

00:05:14
so. Okay.

00:05:15
Give us give us the what is the tech VC symbiosis.

00:05:21
We all have our own ideas but you know how would you

00:05:23
articulate it? I think that reporters that are

00:05:28
covering Tech are looking for like repeated players or voices

00:05:35
of authority that they can speak to about the industry and

00:05:41
frequently they don't know startup.

00:05:43
Founders startup Founders. Maybe it's hard to identify

00:05:46
which ones which companies are important and who you should be

00:05:49
speaking with. And It's very easy to sort of

00:05:52
say, oh well, you know, I'll talk to Andreessen Horowitz or,

00:05:57
you know, some brand-name, VC firm.

00:05:59
And so, those end up being for reasons that.

00:06:02
Don't I think make a lot of sense, the sort of voices of

00:06:04
authority about the industry. And it's sort of strange in a

00:06:09
way if you looked at more traditional businesses, you

00:06:11
know, if you're writing about the oil and gas industry, would

00:06:15
you talk to the banks that are sort of lending the money for

00:06:19
Capital purchases? And like those are the people

00:06:23
that you would sort of like would be the authorities on the

00:06:25
the oil and gas like no that wouldn't that would that would

00:06:28
be weird. You know it's it's it's sort of

00:06:32
unusual. Like if you thought of you see

00:06:34
is as You know, almost more like, like sort of banks, you

00:06:39
know, that were lending money to businesses.

00:06:42
You know, you wouldn't, you wouldn't sort of immediately

00:06:45
think. Like those are, those are the

00:06:46
people that were going to put at the center of the ecosystem.

00:06:51
But, but that is the way often media about tech works and and,

00:06:55
and investors need that. Because in practice, when you

00:07:01
look at a lot of these early stage deals, I think one thing

00:07:05
that sometimes people Don't from the outside, don't understand.

00:07:07
Is it's often just like incredibly obvious to everyone

00:07:12
on the ground like which that there is a company here that you

00:07:17
know, it's not guaranteed but this company has a very decent

00:07:20
chance very early on of having an enormously successful outcome

00:07:25
and it's obvious to a lot of people there.

00:07:28
And so there are tons of investors that would you know

00:07:31
love to put money into that company and in practice the

00:07:34
founder, you know, just the Of their time, you know these

00:07:37
rounds come together and you know 10 days they can maybe meet

00:07:42
with five or six firms. And so who do they end up

00:07:46
meeting with? Well the end up meeting with the

00:07:49
person that they saw, you know, on the front page of the

00:07:52
business section in the New York Times or, you know, in the Wall

00:07:55
Street Journal or that was, you know, maybe covered recently by

00:07:59
Eric's blog because that's sort of who they've heard of.

00:08:04
And, and so from a Aziz perspective that media attention

00:08:09
is oxygen. You know, it's sort of the

00:08:13
closest analogy I can think of is, it's like it's like

00:08:17
celebrities, you know how they like, that's what what they need

00:08:22
because it's the it's the only thing that's truly

00:08:25
differentiating for them. And it's really how.

00:08:27
I mean you've seen that with some firms like Andreessen

00:08:29
Horowitz that really have built their brand, purely on the back

00:08:34
of that media exposure. Or almost entirely on the back

00:08:38
of that media, exposure to such an extent that I think the right

00:08:41
way to think about that firm is it's not really a VC firm.

00:08:45
It's a it's a PR agency that has a very specific monetization

00:08:50
strategy of investing in startup startup companies.

00:08:54
And like, in that vein, it's not surprising that they've now

00:08:57
decided to like create their own content arm and all that kind of

00:09:00
stuff. Because like, they always were

00:09:01
sort of a media company. First, and foremost.

00:09:04
Yeah, putting and reason aside, because I think, They are such a

00:09:06
specific example and you're, you know, you have a history with

00:09:10
Andreessen, which might be interesting to talk about later.

00:09:12
But in this formula, the media, the reporters are kind of

00:09:17
unquestioning in their willingness to feature venture

00:09:21
capitalist. You know, why is it?

00:09:22
Do you think that reporters aren't scrutinizing?

00:09:26
The Venture Capital firms in the way they might be scrutinizing?

00:09:29
The startups themselves, you know, I don't, I don't know, I

00:09:32
guess I would sort of ask maybe ask you guys that.

00:09:35
I mean, sometimes. Times.

00:09:37
Sometimes, it seems to me that reporters are looking for

00:09:42
authority figures, you know, they're looking for it, you

00:09:45
know, they're looking for an authority figure and then like

00:09:48
sort of the looking for Daddy's, parental figures.

00:09:52
I agree with partner and the reality of how these companies

00:09:57
are run. But from the outside, you look

00:09:59
at it and you're like, oh well, you have, you know, these people

00:10:02
are board members, you know, they write the CEOs like you.

00:10:06
No sort of that's their boss. You know, that's not and that's

00:10:10
that's not the reality of the situation but I think it's it's

00:10:13
sort of, you know, like in other beats you know if you're if

00:10:18
you're talking about something that happened at the justice

00:10:20
department, you ultimately want to speak with like Merrick

00:10:24
Garland or like, you know, like his his spokesperson right.

00:10:27
You know. And so like you're looking for

00:10:29
like who's the person at the top and I think that reporters have

00:10:35
sort of conclude And perhaps in accurately that that those

00:10:39
people are the investors and it perturbs.

00:10:42
And distorts a lot of the things about the ecosystem that there's

00:10:46
that perception, that's why you see all these people like

00:10:48
marching out of business school and they all want to become

00:10:50
Venture capitalists, you know. Because like, you know, that's

00:10:53
sort of where the perception of kind of, you know, where where

00:10:58
the where the power is and you know where the sort of the power

00:11:01
behind the throne or whatever, whatever you would call it.

00:11:05
It's okay, it's cute. I mean, please say no, if you

00:11:07
don't want to but would it not be instructive then to look at

00:11:12
zenefits through this lens? And I don't think we introduce

00:11:15
benefits and I think we said what it was, but it was the

00:11:17
company that you started that was enormously successful

00:11:20
specifically in Silicon Valley terms, meaning, the valuation

00:11:23
grew and grew and grew meeting investors were is an HR like an

00:11:26
HR portal. So we're basically trying to buy

00:11:29
more stock essentially in your company ever, higher prices and

00:11:33
your company helped, you know, other corporations.

00:11:36
On board employees and take care of HR functions through you,

00:11:40
through easy-to-use, software was a great idea.

00:11:43
And from the media's point of view, we saw this stratospheric

00:11:48
rise of your company and that attention was sort of built by

00:11:53
the valuations, which are granted by the VCS, which then

00:11:56
make them a huge part of the story because the main data

00:11:59
point, And maybe this is flawed, but the main data point

00:12:03
especially at the time, reporters used to decide which

00:12:06
company mattered, was, was the valuation, especially at that

00:12:09
period and Rocket fueled by Andreessen, which was probably

00:12:12
at. It's like at then, you know,

00:12:14
philosophical voice of the Silicon Valley mouthpiece Peak,

00:12:18
right? That look like from your point

00:12:19
of view, as you were watching the attention turned to your

00:12:23
company in large part, because of this, both VC, fueled

00:12:26
valuation and BC fueled, you know, conversation with the

00:12:30
Press, Yes, so what did that look like inside to you?

00:12:34
Yeah, I mean so you know, there are some things that I can talk

00:12:36
about about zenefits and there's some things that I just can't

00:12:40
and so I probably can't go as deep in this conversation as I'd

00:12:45
like to at some point in time I it's definitely true.

00:12:51
I mean you say that sort of like the Press was fueled by the

00:12:55
valuation which was in turn fueled by like sometimes the

00:12:58
Press was field directly by the VCS themselves.

00:13:00
Like I remember At one point, you know, Kim listen Vic from

00:13:06
Andreessen Horowitz, coming to me and saying, hey, we have, you

00:13:12
know, a reporter from The New York Times, who wants to

00:13:14
profile, a Silicon Valley company and asked us like, which

00:13:17
company should he do? And we told him the company

00:13:20
that, you know, that he should do is then if it's and the clear

00:13:24
implication is like, you know, we sort of instructed like the

00:13:30
media You know, which company to cover and now they're going to

00:13:34
cover York. I mean, it was very like, at

00:13:36
least in the way that they are now.

00:13:37
I don't know what it was like from the reporter's perspective,

00:13:41
but in terms of how they described it to me, it was like

00:13:44
we are telling them to cover your company and that, you know,

00:13:47
became a think. This is just became a story that

00:13:49
Farhad Farhad wrote for the New York Times.

00:13:53
And so there were definite, at least from my perspective, it

00:13:58
was like, wow. No, these, these guys are You

00:14:01
know, they exercised a fair amount of direct control over

00:14:08
sort of the media narrative and, you know, and Eric, you and I

00:14:10
have talked about, you know, just the dinners that, you know,

00:14:16
Margot would have for reporters, you know, at her house right?

00:14:20
Met you. That's right.

00:14:21
I remember, you know, it was incredible to see, you know,

00:14:26
everyone, just the extent to which like invites to Those

00:14:31
dinners were important, you know, like there's an ecosystem

00:14:34
there between VCS and, and the, the tech media that I think puts

00:14:41
the VC firms at the center of these stories in it, in ways

00:14:47
that are sort of sometimes, Miss sort of other other Dynamics.

00:14:53
Those dinners are extremely canny the way that they're

00:14:55
handled. Because first of all reporters

00:14:57
want to be invited to them. Because it shows that, I mean,

00:14:59
if you're at a big publication, you kind of Default get invited

00:15:02
to it and you know the information it was always an

00:15:05
issue at first because for certain places we didn't

00:15:07
register but reporters are always kind of, you know,

00:15:10
screwing around there. Like rats trying to like make

00:15:13
connections with entrepreneurs like you or for VCS thinking

00:15:19
about like this is, you know I like much more.

00:15:22
Yeah more than PCS. I mean as a reporter is still

00:15:26
deep in this bead who's really set up a publication around the

00:15:29
VCS I think for some of The reasons we're talking about.

00:15:33
I do think there's a there's a reality that like the VCS are

00:15:37
just more scalable sources, you know.

00:15:39
They, they know the facts that I want like a great scale.

00:15:44
Where is the founder? Maybe knows a lot about their

00:15:45
company. Nobody wants to leak stuff about

00:15:47
their own company, well. So one question is like, how

00:15:50
does this play out in terms of the type of the, the way that

00:15:54
sort of, you know, coverage, you know, happens for tech.

00:15:58
And, and one way that happens is that often A set of things that

00:16:03
a lot of VCS will agree on that ends up getting sort of

00:16:07
repeated, without a lot of questioning.

00:16:13
You have an example. One example would be that.

00:16:16
We pay too much for startups to invest in them and we would

00:16:20
prefer to pay less for startups to invest in.

00:16:23
Yeah, but also to your point that sentiment belies the fact

00:16:26
that the one of the reasons VCS are paying so much isn't just

00:16:29
because the prices are too high. It's because they're taking in

00:16:32
too much capital in a world where other institutional,

00:16:35
investors are trying to get a return.

00:16:37
Sure. But you know you look at for a

00:16:39
long time you know, Bill girly was out there talking about how

00:16:43
all these startups were valued and everyone like the media

00:16:47
loved him for it you know it was it rests here was an Insider

00:16:51
sort of like speaking truth to you know his own and everyone

00:16:56
viewed it as heroic and no one was sort of saying like maybe

00:16:59
it's this maybe a little bit self-serving.

00:17:01
You know, like why will girlies who I, you know, I like it.

00:17:06
I've profiled is expert at saying one thing and doing

00:17:09
another, you know, are writing blog posts that sort of

00:17:12
implicitly indict, Uber or we work.

00:17:15
Well, you know, to sort of hedge against, you know, his firm's

00:17:19
own actual Behavior, Nasser. And and of course, I think like

00:17:21
and I look, I've never met Bill girly, but it strikes me that

00:17:24
bill girly was a big fan of valuations, being lower for

00:17:27
early-stage startups and and has always been a big fan Fan of the

00:17:32
idea that public markets investors are paying too little

00:17:35
for these companies when they IPO, which, you know, maybe

00:17:39
those two things conflict with each other, maybe they don't.

00:17:42
Are you able to talk about how this sort of like interplay

00:17:46
between valuations and venture capitalist in the media?

00:17:51
You know from your point of view, whatever it is.

00:17:52
You can say how that look to you as an if it's hit a road bump

00:18:00
And some of, yes, I will say that.

00:18:03
The thing that I remember most about benefits as well.

00:18:05
Frankly, our story about people having sex in the stairwells or

00:18:08
something. It was it was condoms in the

00:18:11
stairwell. Hey, we found, you know, a

00:18:26
condom in the stairwell of this Building and that's completely

00:18:30
unacceptable. And the office manager of our

00:18:33
company, sent an email out to everyone at the company saying,

00:18:37
this is completely unacceptable and look there were 30 35 other

00:18:46
companies in that building, it's not even clear that it was

00:18:50
someone at zenefits. But that story got, you know, we

00:18:54
were the ones that sent out that email and that's the email that

00:18:57
they got a hold of and that story got written and Rewritten

00:19:01
and Rewritten in a way that, and okay.

00:19:06
Yeah, by my senses, the zenefits thing was it was, I mean, it was

00:19:10
really a feeding frenzy as far as reporters were concerned.

00:19:12
I mean, they were reporters. I think actually every ykd Eric

00:19:15
and I all at some point, did some sort of zenefits Insider

00:19:19
ep's, maybe not like a feature at the same level as you.

00:19:22
No Eric maybe did or will Alden no longer a reporter but he kind

00:19:27
of, you know, wrote probably the most intensive pieces on it.

00:19:30
I mean what did it seem like to you from that perspective as

00:19:34
this many stores are coming out and reporters are essentially

00:19:36
making their careers out of you know, this sort of Story.

00:19:41
I mean obviously there was there was malfeasance that we were

00:19:44
discussing here and certainly when it came to, you know,

00:19:48
flouting insurance regulations in different states.

00:19:51
You know, you could argue that were Stakes Beyond just And of

00:19:53
condoms in the stairwell, but did it?

00:19:56
I don't know. I mean, I've always wondered

00:19:58
from the entrepreneur perspective, as reporters are

00:20:01
essentially, you know, we're getting pay raises out of

00:20:04
writing stories, like this ultimately, I mean, what is it?

00:20:06
What is it from the other side? I wasn't, I wasn't aware that.

00:20:08
Were you getting pay raises Eric?

00:20:10
It was that a none of us have gotten pay raises in a long

00:20:13
time. Well, not nothing.

00:20:14
It's not like they're like it's more just like, oh, if you write

00:20:18
good stories, you're going to do better in your career, you know

00:20:20
what I mean, right? Tom, are you?

00:20:23
Yeah, yeah, no. I mean, look, I've like gone on

00:20:25
vacations before and I've been like, man, you know what

00:20:27
afforded this vacation like Snapchat, really fucked up a

00:20:30
couple years ago and it's, I mean, look, it's true.

00:20:32
It's the nature of the job and obviously we aspire to Greater

00:20:36
reasons as to why we write these stories and tell more important

00:20:40
things in just that. But, you know, there is another

00:20:43
side to what there are people that were writing about that.

00:20:44
I've always wondered. Look, one thing I will say, is

00:20:47
that when stuff like this happens, there are people that

00:20:52
have institutional apparatus behind them, you know, then

00:20:57
have, you know, PR firms, PR agencies, established media

00:21:03
relationships, Lanny Davis people like like wonderful human

00:21:08
beings, like Lanny Davis, who rep, David Yaks, and who David

00:21:14
hired, you know, immediately, when this went down and who,

00:21:19
from what I've heard from, from other reporters that, you know,

00:21:22
David Sachs and Lanny Davis were kind of on the phone everyday.

00:21:25
Sort of pitching stories about me for six months.

00:21:28
What kinds of stories that I picked?

00:21:30
I don't know. I mean, I, you know, I heard

00:21:32
about a lot of that sort of second hand, but, you know,

00:21:35
there are people like me who are just kind of like, hold up at

00:21:38
home and kind of ignoring all of it and, you know, largely, you

00:21:44
know, not talking to to anyone but isn't isn't that an argument

00:21:48
for the VC's actually being powerful that like that when the

00:21:52
come With the company happens. And reason orbits is super sort

00:21:57
of the power broker in a way that suddenly the founder isn't

00:22:02
or you know, I mean a conflict in your story to me which I

00:22:06
mostly agree with is just you know, andreasen brings in David

00:22:11
Sachs who caused some of your like there are things where the

00:22:13
VC firm clearly had a big role in the company and, you know,

00:22:17
you want to point to them for some blame but you're also like,

00:22:19
oh they're not really big player.

00:22:20
You know I think one one thing is certain sort of understanding

00:22:24
like the nature of like the VC VC s sort of power over

00:22:30
companies and one thing that I've come to understand is it's

00:22:37
not about board control you know, I you know I had control

00:22:45
of the board at Santa Fitz and I think it's really, you know what

00:22:51
happens is The The Authority that that VCS have over

00:22:56
companies is a media Authority. It's a, it's a, it's a public

00:23:00
at, you know, it's say, it's sort of saying.

00:23:01
Like, look, if you, you will do what we want you to do, or we

00:23:06
will publicly go to war with the company, you know, and we will,

00:23:11
you know, sale, these bad things about you in the press and

00:23:14
disavow, the investment. All that kind of stuff, which is

00:23:16
a surprisingly common tactic that firms employee far more

00:23:22
frequently. Lie in terms of that having, you

00:23:25
know, sort of telling Founders that then actually sort of

00:23:28
pulling the trigger and doing it.

00:23:31
And, you know, that is, I think the nature of the authority that

00:23:36
investors often have over these companies is like, far more this

00:23:39
like moral Authority with the public.

00:23:43
And, you know, that's that's something that that I that I

00:23:49
disagree with. So I just want to make sure that

00:23:52
we have all the people who've just mentioned correct correctly

00:23:56
identified because there are people who might not know what

00:23:58
happened. It's benefits.

00:23:59
But David Sachs he came and he replaced you as CEO.

00:24:02
Is that correct? Yeah.

00:24:04
And he was brought in by Venture capitalists by Andreessen,

00:24:08
Horowitz date. Me David joined a year and a

00:24:11
half two years before I left, and he was CEO of the company

00:24:14
for a period of time. Hmm.

00:24:17
And he, what was that your higher or did feces?

00:24:21
Him to join. He was deaf.

00:24:24
He was definitely introduced to me by the VC firm.

00:24:27
I mean I remember there was this moment right around that.

00:24:30
Actually the time that that that piece ran in the New York Times

00:24:33
where, you know, we were like I said if it's growing so quickly,

00:24:38
I mean we were we went in that year when David joined we went

00:24:42
from you know, 20 employees to 450 and I remember talking to

00:24:50
Like Lars dalgaard who is our board member for injuries and

00:24:53
Horowitz in sort of August of that year.

00:24:56
And I said, look I think we've got a, you know, pump the brakes

00:25:00
a little bit and like, slow down because it's just like, it feels

00:25:03
like everywhere. It's just hard to keep up with

00:25:07
and because, you know, when you're growing really quickly

00:25:10
little things that go wrong quickly, spiral out of control

00:25:12
and become like, very hard to address and Lars looked at me

00:25:17
and he said, don't you dare, if you do that, You don't know that

00:25:22
when you are ready to grow again whether you're even able to you

00:25:28
know whether the sort of focus of the market has turned

00:25:32
somewhere else and he said look let's let's hire a CEO.

00:25:37
Oh and I you know there's this great guy that we've been

00:25:39
talking with who's David and that's and then I met with David

00:25:44
and that's idea joint. He was impressive to you as I

00:25:47
mean, he's like a I was impressed about is like sure was

00:25:50
a big name, you know, PayPal, you know, like I mean it was a,

00:25:55
you know, superficially. You know, he was, you know, he

00:26:01
was an impressive, Brent, you were connected to the mafia,

00:26:04
this is good. I mean, I feel like we I mean

00:26:13
now we've talked about zenefits a lot.

00:26:14
So I want to make the Clear. The clear argument against you

00:26:17
is just, you know, first that there was the macro this tool

00:26:21
that help people stay on their sort of licensing test, when

00:26:25
they're supposed to send a certain amount of time.

00:26:27
Yes it didn't progress them through it but it was a tool

00:26:30
that sort of was meant to skirt, you know, the legal requirements

00:26:36
and then to you know, there were in fact, and this is what we'll

00:26:39
Dalton was reporting legitimately that there were,

00:26:42
you know, Brokers that were unlicensed, you know.

00:26:45
There were license one state but not in the state.

00:26:47
They were selling in and that there's an argument certainly

00:26:50
for injuries since acts that they were going to have this

00:26:53
huge that they had legitimate legal problems and the company

00:26:57
was going to have to move past them and I mean it's a classic.

00:27:01
I mean I think literally I found was it Ben Horowitz or Marc

00:27:05
Andreessen who had written a post that when you turn on the

00:27:07
CEO you need to turn on them like 100%.

00:27:09
So you have these problems, you say, okay it's you know the

00:27:13
responsibilities sort of rolls up to the Top and like we don't

00:27:17
have voting control. So we really need a gun for this

00:27:19
guy. And then I mean that's that's

00:27:21
sort of the strategy. I don't know.

00:27:24
Do you disagree with that portrait?

00:27:27
I mean, you know, look, I, you know, I think there's not enough

00:27:30
time this podcast to get into the sort of ins and outs of all

00:27:33
the of all that of all. Sure enough.

00:27:35
Can I ask you Parker about your, you know, in starting Rippling,

00:27:40
which is the benefits competitor.

00:27:42
Yeah, yes. Yeah, yeah.

00:27:44
And I remember, And you know, you were raised in that initial

00:27:47
round and the stories were coming together, that like here

00:27:49
comes Parker Conrad again and it was something of a comeback

00:27:53
story. Something of a I can't believe

00:27:54
they let this guy in the building again story and you

00:27:58
know, ultimately it's doing very well.

00:28:00
We used Rippling actually at the information switch from zenefits

00:28:03
to Rippling at some point down the line.

00:28:05
So that's one account one. But you know, what did it what

00:28:09
was that process? Like for you, as you were

00:28:11
starting a new company coming back as the guy that had been

00:28:15
deposed. As for the previous one and

00:28:16
effectively, doing the same thing.

00:28:19
So first, I mean, I would I would disagree that it's the

00:28:21
same thing. I think it's extremely

00:28:23
different. It in ways that I mean I'll try

00:28:27
to articulate and then you may say yeah but it's the same thing

00:28:30
I think that the biggest difference for me is that, you

00:28:37
know, the central Insight at my last company that sometimes

00:28:41
sometimes people Miss is that, you know, sometimes people think

00:28:43
zenefits was just online health. And that was actually really

00:28:46
what it was, what made the company work is that you had

00:28:51
this button to hire someone and you would click hire and they

00:28:55
would sort of show up automatically in all of your HR

00:28:59
systems. You know, they'd get set up in

00:29:01
payroll, we get their agreement signed, they would show up and

00:29:04
medical insurance, dental, insurance 401 k.

00:29:07
And before that company came along, those things were all

00:29:12
completely separate systems. Like these were separate places.

00:29:15
As you have to set up employees and there was a lot of

00:29:17
administrative work associated with that and now of course,

00:29:22
that's become sort of like par for the course across a lot of,

00:29:25
you know, payroll and HR systems.

00:29:27
I think one of the big difference with Rippling is the

00:29:30
belief that, you know, employee data is important for almost all

00:29:37
business systems within a company, not just the HR ones

00:29:41
and that, as a result of that, there's this Actually the root

00:29:46
of most of the administrative pain of you know, most at most

00:29:52
companies comes back to this fact that man, all of the

00:29:56
different business systems that you use are different places

00:29:59
where you need to manage employee information one way or

00:30:02
another, you know like why is it, you got it.

00:30:04
It's a pain in the butt. You got to set people up with

00:30:06
email access with slack access with access to Dropbox and

00:30:10
Salesforce and GitHub. And you need to manage email

00:30:13
list, memberships and slack Channel.

00:30:15
And policies that apply to them and all these different systems,

00:30:19
and all of these things are fundamentally about employee

00:30:22
data. You know, it's about someone

00:30:24
gets access to sales force because they work in the sales

00:30:26
department. They, you know, they need to be

00:30:29
subscribed to an email list because they're a manager on

00:30:32
your customer support team. And so if you have an underlying

00:30:36
system that understands all of that, you can give people that

00:30:40
same button, where they click a button to hire someone.

00:30:44
But in this case, People get set up everywhere you know they get

00:30:47
their computer shipped out to them.

00:30:49
They get access to all these different Business Systems, they

00:30:52
get added all the right email list, sock channels and

00:30:55
policies, and groups and license types or whatever.

00:30:59
And yes, they get enrolled in insurance and set up in payroll

00:31:02
and all this different stuff in it.

00:31:03
That was there was a sort of much bigger opportunity as a

00:31:09
result as a result of that. And I think what happened is,

00:31:11
you know, zenefits was probably starting to move in that

00:31:14
direction. Towards the tail end of my time

00:31:16
there, but as soon as I left all of those projects immediately

00:31:21
got killed because they were sort of the Ancien Regime and so

00:31:25
they all got sort of shut down immediately.

00:31:27
And you know, you know the the new CEO came in and you know, he

00:31:37
started firing people and he fired all the wrong people, you

00:31:41
know? And he fired a lot of people

00:31:42
because they were, you know, In some way, associated with me or,

00:31:48
or at least I saw it as like, these are all you're laying out.

00:31:50
And of course, any Founders going to look at.

00:31:52
You know what? Someone comes in afterwards and

00:31:54
say, like they're doing it all wrong, but I sort of felt like,

00:31:58
man, this thing that I wanted to exist this product that I

00:32:03
thought I wanted to use that, I thought was the way that

00:32:05
business should do, this stuff wasn't going to exist, you know

00:32:09
that then if it's was kind of going off in this different

00:32:12
direction and you know, other editor's were not going to build

00:32:16
it and at the same time, you know, I, you know, was feeling a

00:32:24
lot of frustration about what was going on in the media and

00:32:28
sort of what was being written about me in the press and places

00:32:32
like that. And I sort of felt like the only

00:32:36
way that I was going to speak, you know, to the extended, you

00:32:45
know, Kind of Tech Community to the media to my friends and

00:32:49
family. The only way I was going to be

00:32:52
able to do that was to like build this specific company and

00:32:56
turn it into like a hundred billion dollar outcome.

00:33:00
And then if I could do that at some point, that would force

00:33:04
some kind of reassessment of all of this and how far into the

00:33:11
hundred billion, there were all kinds of reasons.

00:33:14
I wasn't able to serve Really talked about it.

00:33:16
There were, you know, I wasn't, you know, that's not, I wasn't,

00:33:21
that's not where that kind of politicking wasn't really where

00:33:24
my my talent slide and but this was something I could do, you

00:33:29
know, like I felt like I had a point of view about what the

00:33:33
market needed and sort of how to get there.

00:33:36
And that that was the thing I was going to focus on and then

00:33:39
if I did that, you know, and so we're you know, I'm 45 pounds.

00:33:45
Now, the story is not, how could you, how could you raise, raise

00:33:48
VC, money again? I mean, sort of, I mean,

00:33:51
basically, the YC crowd sticks with you, Sam Altman, initialize

00:33:55
back. You, I mean, what did you did

00:33:58
you change anything about how you worked with VC's in this or

00:34:01
what or you're just sort of stuck in that trap?

00:34:04
I think I'm extremely grateful. They're there were a bunch of

00:34:08
investors that backed me and supported me when it was not a

00:34:13
popular thing to do. And I will be forever grateful

00:34:18
to, you know, to yc2 Gary tan to Mamoon @k p and all those folks

00:34:29
and yeah and other sort of new investors like CO2 and folks

00:34:34
like that. I think in general, like most of

00:34:36
the investors who really understood what happened?

00:34:40
Did not have any issue with it and and the investors that went

00:34:45
really Upon diligence sort of came out of that.

00:34:48
Be like, we have no concerns did Ben Horowitz, try and scare

00:34:52
anybody off. There were definitely like

00:34:55
people. There were definitely, I don't

00:34:57
know about been specifically, but certainly certainly.

00:35:02
There were, there were people like, like Saks or others who

00:35:06
called up, you know, people in that process and said, don't

00:35:09
invest. And sometimes they did that

00:35:12
success preemptively. Like not as a reference

00:35:14
priapism. Like, oh absolutely would go

00:35:16
around preemptively. Yeah, no, I mean, there was a

00:35:21
firm that I had a GP meeting scheduled with on a Monday and,

00:35:27
you know, I think David called him right before and on Sunday,

00:35:29
they called me up and said up like so and so just talk to

00:35:32
David. He's poker buddies with him and,

00:35:37
you know, sorry I've got to cancel the GP meeting.

00:35:41
I'd like to just, you know, for change course for just a second

00:35:46
and note that you have been starting companies for a really

00:35:49
long time. I think the first company you

00:35:51
started was in 2006. Is that correct?

00:35:55
Yeah, that's right. And it was, it was a financial

00:35:58
services start up of some sort Sig fig.

00:36:01
And so was many things over the course of time that I was there.

00:36:05
You know, your first company wasn't 2006 and I note.

00:36:08
There's an interesting description of your History in a

00:36:12
profile of you from last year. Basically that you start your

00:36:15
first company in 2006 and you're pushed out of the company

00:36:19
because you have a falling out with the co-founder and then

00:36:24
zenefits you leave that company obviously after a falling out

00:36:28
with both investors and with David Sachs and so in this in

00:36:36
this latest iteration of the company or starting, can you

00:36:39
talk a little bit about what it is?

00:36:41
As you learn, you know, you know these these tough Departures,

00:36:44
what it what what has what have you change about yourself in

00:36:48
response to? You know, these startups that

00:36:52
have come and gone for you? You know what, what how do you

00:36:55
see things differently than you did in 2006 or even when you

00:36:59
started zenefits about yourself? I think it's really hard.

00:37:07
I think the only the only thing. I mean I've obviously I've Had

00:37:11
some big successes in my life. And I've had a lot of pretty

00:37:13
catastrophic failures and a lot of big ups and downs.

00:37:16
And, and I think like the only people in Silicon Valley, always

00:37:20
sort of want to sort of mythologize failure.

00:37:24
And the only thing that I've ever really learned from

00:37:27
failure, is how much it sucks and how much you never want it

00:37:30
to happen again and beyond that, I'm not sure that there are a

00:37:36
lot of meaningful deep lessons from it.

00:37:40
To be totally honest. Cool.

00:37:42
All right, this is awesome. Thank you for doing our first

00:37:46
experiment. I think it's like a fascinating,

00:37:50
you know. Yeah.

00:37:52
It's an interesting story and I'm aware has Rippling a raised

00:37:58
secret new funding around. Or what's the secret do?

00:38:01
Funny rods. What's a what's a funny?

00:38:04
It's the latest valuation weapons down.

00:38:28
Cool. Thanks, guys.

00:38:29
Parker. Thank you.

00:38:30
And I hope you have a good time. Beautiful part of me.

00:38:33
Oh thank you. Cool.

00:38:34
And thanks for hanging with a bunch of really annoying

00:38:37
questions at the end. No, no problem.

00:38:39
I'll touch you guys later. Hey everybody, this is Tom here,

00:38:47
quickly, before I sign off, I did want to make sure that I

00:38:50
credited, the great music that you heard in our intro and

00:38:53
outro. That is by Young Chomsky who is

00:38:57
at Young Chomsky on Twitter, very graciously.

00:39:00
Let us use his previously composed piece about Silicon

00:39:03
Valley as our music. So thanks so much to him and see

00:39:08
you guys all back here next week.

00:39:10
Goodbye, So work on Sally. Goodbye.

00:39:21
Goodbye. Goodbye, goodbye, goodbye.

00:39:24
Goodbye. Goodbye.

00:39:21
Goodbye. Goodbye, goodbye, goodbye.

00:39:24
Goodbye.